Filter advanced network theory:
It has been found that ideal filters cannot be physically
realized. Consider, for example, the impulse response
of an ideal LPF. By definition and using
This is a sin c pulse in time and non-zero
for t < 0.
we observe: the output h(t) appears
before the impulse is
applied. Such a filter is said to be anticipatory, and
the portion of the output appearing before the input
is called a precursor. Clearly, such behavior is physically
impossible, and hence the filter must be non-realizable.
Similar results are found for the band-pass and high-pass
case.
However, ideal filters
are conceptually useful in the study of communication
systems. In practice, filters can be designed which
come quite close to being ideal, at least for engineering
purposes. The above illustration shows a practical low-pass
filter which is both simple and has a reasonably sharp
cutoff. Like all real filters, the cut-off is not perfectly
straight, so the bandwidth is internationally specified
in terms of the 3 - dB frequency points. The
impulse response shown in above illustration is seen
to be similar to a line pulse minus the precursors.
Filters with more complicated
designs, such as Butterworth and Chebyshev filters,
more closely approximate the ideal filter.
We further observe:
As the number of reactive elements increases without
limit, the transfer function can be made arbitrarily
close to that of an ideal filter.
But at the same time, the filter time delay increases
without limit, making the filter useless.
Moreover, the infinite time delay means the precursors,
will always appear after the input is applied, which
must be true of a real filter.
In our further analysis,
we shall often assume filters to be virtually ideal
and examine their effects on signal transmission. We
should keep in mind that in the frequency domain, the
effects are obvious as frequency components falling
outside the filter pass-band are removed from the spectrum
but effects in the time domain may or may not be easily
captured.